Comments on: Replacing ls in OS X http://biphenyl.org/blog/2007/11/10/replacing-ls-in-os-x/ Aromatic, organic, no longer associated with persistent environmental toxins? Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:34:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Dom http://biphenyl.org/blog/2007/11/10/replacing-ls-in-os-x/#comment-1978 Dom Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:29:11 +0000 http://biphenyl.org/blog/2007/11/10/replacing-ls-in-os-x/#comment-1978 Thanks. This was just what I needed. However, for OS X 10.5, I needed this hack to work around a linker error: ./configure jm_cv_func_svid_putenv=yes A known issue described here: (http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-gnulib@gnu.org/msg08420.html) Thanks. This was just what I needed.

However, for OS X 10.5, I needed this hack to work around a linker error:

./configure jm_cv_func_svid_putenv=yes

A known issue described here:
(http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-gnulib@gnu.org/msg08420.html)

]]> By: biphenyl http://biphenyl.org/blog/2007/11/10/replacing-ls-in-os-x/#comment-904 biphenyl Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:43:51 +0000 http://biphenyl.org/blog/2007/11/10/replacing-ls-in-os-x/#comment-904 Right - I'm familiar with -G but this is just the BSD-style ls, which doesn't support things like custom coloring per extension, etc. I wanted a little more out of the color options, so decided to compile the GNU version. Right - I’m familiar with -G but this is just the BSD-style ls, which doesn’t support things like custom coloring per extension, etc. I wanted a little more out of the color options, so decided to compile the GNU version.

]]> By: Ian Clarke http://biphenyl.org/blog/2007/11/10/replacing-ls-in-os-x/#comment-894 Ian Clarke Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:52:18 +0000 http://biphenyl.org/blog/2007/11/10/replacing-ls-in-os-x/#comment-894 Noooooooo! ls in OSX has supported color since 10.3 - you need to use the -G option (not --color). Noooooooo!

ls in OSX has supported color since 10.3 - you need to use the -G option (not –color).

]]>